If you purchased an Indexed Universal Life (IUL) insurance policy in Michigan and believe your agent misrepresented the product or failed to disclose critical risks, you may have grounds for a lawsuit. RP Legal LLC represents Michigan policyholders who have been harmed by unsuitable IUL sales, misrepresentation, and agent misconduct. Our Michigan IUL lawsuit lawyers investigate your claim, gather evidence, and pursue compensation on your behalf.

RP Legal LLC has recovered millions for policyholders harmed by insurance agent misconduct. Contact us today for a free consultation (803) 805-7546.

Table Of Contents

    How RP Legal LLC Handles Michigan IUL Lawsuit Cases

    RP Legal LLC investigates Michigan IUL claims thoroughly and pursues compensation through negotiation and litigation. Our approach combines detailed policy analysis with expert testimony to build compelling cases.

    Comprehensive policy review: We examine your policy documents, illustrations, and sales materials. We assess whether the illustrations shown to you reflected realistic assumptions and whether they disclosed material facts about surrender charges, policy lapses, and fees. We evaluate whether your agent conducted a proper suitability analysis before recommending the IUL policy. This detailed review often reveals clear evidence of misconduct.

    Evidence gathering: We collect evidence of agent misconduct through document analysis, expert testimony, and investigation into the agent’s sales practices and history of complaints. We identify whether your agent engaged in churning, misrepresentation, or unsuitable sales practices that violated Michigan insurance laws and industry standards. Our investigators examine the agent’s compliance record and prior complaints filed with the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services.

    Negotiation strategy: We focus on resolving your claim efficiently while maximizing your recovery. We communicate with the insurance company and agent’s broker to present evidence of misconduct and demand compensation for your losses—including the difference between what you were promised and what you received, surrender charges paid, and other damages. Most cases resolve through settlement negotiations.

    Litigation when necessary: If negotiation doesn’t produce a fair settlement, we litigate your case in Michigan courts. We present expert testimony about IUL mechanics, industry standards, and the agent’s deviations from those standards. We hold agents and insurers accountable for their misconduct and pursue the compensation you deserve. Our litigation team has extensive experience with insurance agent misconduct cases.

    Contingency fee representation: RP Legal LLC represents Michigan IUL policyholders on a contingency fee basis—you pay no legal fees unless we recover compensation for you. This arrangement ensures you can pursue your claim without financial risk.

    Common IUL Misrepresentation and Misconduct Issues in Michigan

    Michigan policyholders frequently encounter several forms of IUL-related misconduct from insurance agents and brokers. Understanding these common issues can help you identify whether you have grounds for an IUL lawsuit.

    Misrepresented returns and guarantees: Agents show illustrations with unrealistic projections based on historical market performance. Agents often highlight best-case scenarios while downplaying or omitting the risks, caps, and floors that limit actual returns. Many policyholders discover their cash value grows far slower than illustrated, or that their policy lapses unexpectedly. This type of conduct violates industry standards established by the NAIC Model Law #585 for Universal Life Insurance.

    Churning and unsuitable policy replacements: Agents convince existing policyholders to replace stable whole life or term policies with IUL products – primarily to earn higher commissions. This practice harms policyholders by triggering surrender charges on old policies, resetting the cost basis, and exposing them to unnecessary market risk. Churning represents a serious form of insurance agent misconduct.

    Failure to disclose surrender charges and policy lapses: Policyholders remain unaware of the costs and consequences of accessing their cash value. Surrender charges can consume 10-15% or more of the cash value in early years, and policyholders often don’t learn about these fees until they attempt a withdrawal. The Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) requires clear disclosure of all surrender charges before policy issuance.

    Illustration misrepresentation: Agents show projections that assume unrealistic index returns or fail to account for policy fees, mortality charges, and administrative costs. These misleading IUL illustrations create false expectations about policy performance and cash value accumulation. The NAIC AG 49-A Guidelines specifically address IUL illustration standards and require agents to disclose material assumptions.

    Inadequate suitability analysis: Agents fail to assess whether an IUL policy matches the client’s financial situation, risk tolerance, and objectives. Elderly investors, conservative savers, and those nearing retirement often receive unsuitable IUL recommendations that expose them to unnecessary risk. This represents a violation of fiduciary duty and suitability requirements under Michigan insurance law.

    What constitutes IUL misrepresentation?

    IUL misrepresentation occurs when an agent makes false or misleading statements about policy features, returns, risks, or suitability. This includes showing illustrations that don’t reflect realistic performance, failing to disclose material facts about surrender charges or policy lapses, or recommending an IUL policy without conducting a proper suitability analysis. Michigan law holds agents accountable for these violations under MCL 600.5813 (insurance fraud and misrepresentation).

    Why Michigan Policyholders File IUL Lawsuits

    Michigan residents file IUL lawsuits for several compelling reasons rooted in agent misconduct and product complexity. If you’ve experienced any of these issues, you may have grounds for a claim.

    Policy lapse due to insufficient cash value: Policyholders who relied on agent projections discover their cash value depletes faster than expected. They must pay higher premiums to keep the policy in force or watch it lapse entirely. This leaves them without the coverage they purchased and potentially liable for taxes on policy gains. Many policyholders have recovered substantial damages for these losses through litigation.

    Unexpected surrender charges and fees: Policyholders face shock when they attempt to access their cash value. Agents frequently fail to explain that withdrawing cash value triggers substantial surrender charges—sometimes 10-15% or more in early policy years—effectively trapping policyholders’ money in the policy. These undisclosed fees represent a major source of policyholder harm.

    Failure to meet projected returns: Actual index performance, combined with policy caps and fees, produces returns far below what illustrations suggested. Policyholders who expected 6-8% annual returns discover their policies earn 3-5% or less after accounting for all costs, with many receiving returns below 4%. This performance gap often triggers litigation against agents and insurers.

    Agents failed to explain risks and complexity: Policyholders remain unprepared for market downturns, policy lapses, or the mechanics of index crediting. Many policyholders didn’t understand they could lose coverage or face substantial out-of-pocket costs to maintain their policies. This lack of transparency violates industry standards and fiduciary duties.

    Unsuitable sales to elderly or conservative investors: Agents sell IUL policies to retirees and risk-averse savers who have no business exposure to market-indexed products, prioritizing commissions over client welfare. This represents a particularly troubling form of misconduct that disproportionately harms vulnerable populations. Unsuitable sales to seniors often result in significant recoveries for affected policyholders.

    Financial and Insurance Firms We Target

    Insurance Companies

    Financial Firms

    IUL Lawsuits Nationwide

    At RP Legal LLC, we handle IUL cases nationwide, bringing empathy and expertise to every client. No matter where you are, we’re here to help.

    Frequently Asked Questions About Michigan IUL Lawsuits

    Can I sue my insurance agent for IUL misrepresentation?

    Yes. Michigan law holds insurance agents accountable for misrepresentation, unsuitable sales, and breach of fiduciary duty. If your agent made false statements about policy features, returns, or risks, or recommended an IUL policy without assessing your suitability, you have grounds for a lawsuit against the agent and potentially the insurance company or broker. Many policyholders have successfully recovered damages through such lawsuits.

    What is the statute of limitations for IUL lawsuits in Michigan?

    In Michigan, the statute of limitations for IUL insurance misrepresentation and fraud claims is generally six years under MCL 600.5813. However, claims for negligent procurement by an insurance agent are subject to a three-year limitation period under MCL 600.5805(2), which accrues from the date the insurance carrier denies your claim. If fraud is fraudulently concealed, you may have up to two years from discovery to file suit under MCL 600.5855. Contacting an attorney promptly ensures you preserve your rights and don’t miss critical deadlines.

    How long does an IUL lawsuit take to resolve?

    IUL lawsuits typically resolve within 12-24 months through settlement negotiations. Some cases proceed to trial, which can extend the timeline. RP Legal LLC works to resolve your claim efficiently while ensuring you receive fair compensation. The timeline depends on case complexity and whether the defendant is willing to negotiate.

    What damages can I recover in an IUL lawsuit?

    You may recover compensatory damages including the difference between projected and actual policy performance, surrender charges paid, excess premiums paid to keep the policy in force, and other out-of-pocket losses. In cases involving egregious misconduct, punitive damages may also apply. Our attorneys can evaluate your specific situation to estimate potential recovery.

    Do I need to file a complaint with the Michigan Department of Insurance first?

    While filing a complaint with the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) can be helpful, it is not a prerequisite for filing a lawsuit. You can pursue legal action independently. However, regulatory complaints create a record of misconduct that supports your lawsuit. We can assist with filing complaints as part of your overall strategy.

    How much does it cost to hire an IUL lawsuit lawyer?

    RP Legal LLC represents Michigan IUL policyholders on a contingency fee basis. You pay no upfront legal fees, and we recover our fees only if we obtain compensation for you through settlement or judgment. This arrangement ensures you can pursue your claim without financial risk. Contact us today to discuss your case.

    Contact RP Legal LLC for Your Michigan IUL Lawsuit

    If you believe you were harmed by IUL misrepresentation or agent misconduct in Michigan, contact RP Legal LLC today for a free consultation. Our Michigan IUL lawsuit lawyers review your case, explain your legal options, and pursue the compensation you deserve.

    Michigan policyholders have limited time to file IUL lawsuits under the statute of limitations. Don’t delay – reach out to RP Legal LLC now to protect your rights and recover your losses.

    Call (803) 805-7546 or complete our online contact form to schedule your free consultation.

    Last Updated: 11-04-2025

    Case Results Our Record Speaks For Itself
    Recoveries for Victims of IUL and FIP Investment Fraud
    $10,000,000

    RP Legal LLC has recovered over tens of millions of dollars for victims in these cases.
    Learn more

    Jury Verdict for Failed IUL Retirement Strategy
    $1,500,000

    A jury awarded $1,526,156.54 for our client, ruling against Pacific Life Insurance Company.

    Learn more

    Featured on InsuranceNewsNet
    LEADERSHIP

    Robert Rikard, founding attorney of RP Legal LLC, was recently featured in a nationally recognized insurance publication.

    Learn more

    Any result the lawyer or law firm may have achieved on behalf of clients in other matters does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients.

    Client Testimonials
    ~ Alex

    Great attorneys that were able to help me with all my legal issues involving my LLC. I would 100% recommend this firm to anyone who needs legal assistance with their small business.

    ~ Charles

    Solid litigators who have your best interest in mind!

    ~ Giovanni

    Great attorneys! Professional and patient. I enjoyed working with them!

    ~ Christopher

    If you want real lawyers that don’t mess around and waste your time then hire these guys. Robert Rikard and Peter Protopapas are aggressive trial lawyers. The staff is friendly and helpful as well!!! 100% recommend!

    ~ Charles

    Peter is the BEST!! I had the misfortune of needing an attorney, and through a chance encounter was pointed in his direction. Their attention to detail and knowledge of their profession is second to none! Don’t waste your time with these ambulance chasers you see all over the TV - if you need results look no further!!

    TOP-RATED
    LAWYER NEAR YOU
    2110 N Beltline Blvd
    Columbia, SC 29204

    Phone: (803) 805-7546

    FAX: 803-978-6112

    View Directions
    10 Shem Drive, Suite 200
    Mt Pleasant, SC 29464

    Phone: (803) 805-7546

    FAX: 803-978-6112

    View Directions
    REQUEST A FREE CONSULTATION We’re Here To Help

    "*" indicates required fields