John Hancock Life Insurance Company faces mounting legal challenges over deceptive practices involving Indexed Universal Life (IUL) policies. Policyholders across the country have filed lawsuits alleging that John Hancock and its agents misrepresented these complex financial products. These misrepresentations led to significant financial losses for families who trusted these policies for retirement planning.
If you purchased a John Hancock IUL policy and experienced unexpected premium increases, policy lapses, or discovered that your policy performed far below the illustrations shown during the sales process, you may have grounds for legal action. The investment fraud attorneys at RP Legal LLC have recovered over $100 million for clients harmed by deceptive insurance practices. Additionally, we stand ready to help you seek justice.
Understanding John Hancock IUL Fraud Claims
What Are Indexed Universal Life Insurance Policies?
Indexed Universal Life insurance policies represent a complex hybrid financial product. These policies combine life insurance coverage with an investment component tied to stock market indices. John Hancock markets these policies as offering the potential for tax-free retirement income while providing life insurance protection. However, the reality often differs dramatically from the sales presentations.
IUL policies credit interest based on the performance of market indices like the S&P 500. These policies include caps and floors that limit both gains and losses. While agents often emphasize the “no downside risk” feature, they frequently fail to adequately explain how insurance costs work. Administrative fees and policy charges can erode cash value even when the underlying index performs well.
John Hancock’s Performance Universal Life policies became the subject of major class action litigation. These policies promised stable costs and predictable growth. However, many policyholders discovered that John Hancock could unilaterally increase the cost of insurance charges. This devastated the policy’s cash value and forced unexpected premium payments.
Common Deceptive Practices in John Hancock IUL Sales
Insurance agents and financial advisors selling John Hancock IUL policies often employ misleading sales tactics. These deceptive practices violate state insurance regulations and breach fiduciary duties. Furthermore, these practices include:
Misrepresenting IULs as Investment Products: Agents frequently present IUL policies as superior alternatives to 401(k) plans or other retirement investments. They emphasize potential returns while downplaying the insurance costs that can consume cash value growth. This “tax-free retirement” marketing theme ignores the substantial risks of policy lapses and loan defaults.
Using Unrealistic Illustrations: Sales presentations often show projected returns based on historical market performance. However, they fail to adequately explain how caps, spreads, and insurance charges will reduce actual returns. Many John Hancock IUL illustrations assumed sustained high returns that proved impossible to achieve in practice.
Failing to Disclose Cost Increases: John Hancock reserved the right to increase cost of insurance charges. However, agents often failed to explain this critical feature or its potential impact on policy performance. The company’s decision to implement significant COI increases beginning in 2018-2019 caught many policyholders off guard.
Unsuitable Sales to Older Clients: Many John Hancock IUL policies were sold to individuals approaching or in retirement. This occurred despite the long-term nature of these products and the high likelihood that older policyholders would need to access cash value before the policy could mature effectively. This represents financial elder abuse in many cases.
How Misleading Illustrations Harm Policyholders
The heart of many John Hancock IUL fraud claims lies in the gap between sales illustrations and actual policy performance. Insurance agents typically present computer-generated projections showing how the policy might perform under various scenarios. However, these illustrations often contain several problematic assumptions:
Overly Optimistic Return Assumptions: Illustrations frequently assume annual returns of 6-8% or higher, based on historical market performance. However, the combination of market volatility, caps on gains, and ongoing insurance costs makes such returns difficult to achieve consistently.
Understated Insurance Costs: Early illustrations may show cost of insurance charges remaining level or increasing modestly. They fail to account for John Hancock’s reserved right to increase these charges substantially. When the company implemented significant COI increases, many policies that appeared sustainable suddenly required additional premium payments.
Inadequate Stress Testing: Sales presentations rarely show how policies would perform under adverse scenarios. These scenarios include extended periods of low market returns or significant increases in insurance costs. This leaves policyholders unprepared for the financial reality of maintaining their coverage.
Loan Assumption Errors: Many illustrations assume policyholders can take substantial loans against cash value without affecting the policy’s long-term viability. In practice, loans reduce the death benefit and can accelerate policy collapse if not carefully managed.
Major John Hancock Lawsuits and Settlements
The $123 Million Cost of Insurance Class Action Settlement
John Hancock faced a major class action lawsuit resulting in a $123 million settlement over unlawful increases to cost of insurance charges on Performance Universal Life policies. The litigation alleged that beginning in 2018-2019, John Hancock implemented substantial COI increases. These increases violated the terms of existing policies and caused significant financial harm to policyholders.
The settlement covered policyholders whose Performance Universal Life policies were subject to these increased charges. Class members received automatic payments without needing to file claims. This reflected the clear evidence of John Hancock’s wrongdoing. The settlement website, hancockcoisettlement.com, provided detailed information about the approved class action and payment process.
This settlement represents one of the largest recoveries against a major life insurance company for deceptive practices related to universal life policies. The case established important precedents regarding insurance companies’ obligations to policyholders. Additionally, it established limits on their ability to unilaterally modify policy terms. The settlement also included a 5-year freeze on further COI rate increases and restrictions on claim denials.
Leonard v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company Settlement
The Leonard class action lawsuit challenged John Hancock’s practices regarding Performance Universal Life policies. The case was filed in federal court in New York and resulted in significant relief for affected policyholders. The case, formally titled Leonard, et al. v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company of New York, et al., was assigned case number 1:18-cv-04994-AKH.
This litigation focused on John Hancock’s decision to increase cost of insurance rates on existing policies. The lawsuit argued that these increases violated the company’s contractual obligations and constituted a breach of fiduciary duty. The settlement provided compensation to class members and required John Hancock to modify its practices regarding future COI adjustments.
The Leonard settlement complemented the broader $123 million class action. This combination provided comprehensive relief for John Hancock policyholders. Both settlements demonstrate the value of experienced legal representation in holding insurance companies accountable for their actions.
Recent Universal Life Policy Litigation Trends
John Hancock’s legal troubles extend beyond the major class action settlements. The company has faced additional regulatory actions and individual lawsuits challenging various aspects of its insurance practices:
New York Regulatory Settlement: In August 2022, John Hancock agreed to pay $26.3 million to settle allegations by New York regulators regarding canceled insurance policies. This settlement addressed claims that the company improperly handled policy cancellations and failed to provide adequate notice to policyholders. The settlement involved the premature termination of 156 New York State Partnership Long-Term Care policies between February 2001 and July 2019.
Individual Fraud Claims: Beyond class actions, John Hancock faces numerous individual lawsuits from policyholders alleging fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. These cases often involve instances of unsuitable sales or particularly egregious misrepresentations by agents.
Legal Grounds for John Hancock IUL Fraud Claims
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Insurance agents and companies owe fiduciary duties to their clients. This requires them to act in the policyholder’s interests rather than prioritizing commissions or company profits. John Hancock IUL fraud claims often center on violations of these fundamental obligations:
Failure to Disclose Material Information: Agents must inform clients about all material aspects of IUL policies. This includes the potential for cost increases, the impact of market volatility on cash value growth, and the risks associated with policy loans. Many John Hancock agents failed to provide adequate disclosure about these critical features.
Recommending Unsuitable Products: Fiduciary duty requires agents to recommend only products that align with the client’s financial situation, risk tolerance, and investment objectives. Selling complex IUL policies to individuals who lack the financial sophistication to understand them violates this duty. Similarly, recommending these policies to those who need more liquid investments violates this obligation.
Prioritizing Commissions Over Client Interests: IUL policies typically generate substantial commissions for agents. This creates conflicts of interest that must be disclosed and managed appropriately. When agents recommend IUL policies primarily to earn higher commissions rather than serve client needs, they breach their fiduciary obligations.
Misrepresentation and Unsuitable Sales Practices
Many John Hancock IUL fraud claims involve direct misrepresentations about policy features, performance expectations, or costs. These misrepresentations can support claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and violations of state insurance regulations:
False Performance Projections: Agents who present unrealistic illustrations or promise specific returns commit actionable misrepresentation. Even when illustrations include required disclaimers, agents who verbally contradict these warnings or minimize their significance may face liability.
Concealing Policy Risks: Failing to explain the potential for cost increases constitutes material misrepresentation. Similarly, not explaining the impact of poor market performance or the risks associated with policy loans represents material misrepresentation. Policyholders have the right to understand all significant risks before purchasing coverage.
Mischaracterizing Product Features: Describing IUL policies as “investments” rather than insurance products represents clear misrepresentation. Claiming they offer guaranteed returns also constitutes misrepresentation that can support fraud claims.
Violation of State Insurance Regulations
State insurance departments regulate the sale and marketing of life insurance products. This includes requirements for IUL policy sales. John Hancock and its agents must comply with these regulations. Violations can provide grounds for legal action:
Illustration Requirements: States typically require that policy illustrations include disclaimers, use approved assumptions, and present information in standardized formats. Agents who deviate from these requirements or supplement official illustrations with misleading materials may violate state law.
Suitability Standards: Many states require agents to confirm that recommended insurance products are suitable for the client’s needs and financial situation. Selling IUL policies to inappropriate candidates violates these suitability requirements.
Disclosure Obligations: State regulations often mandate disclosures about policy features, costs, and risks. Agents who fail to provide required disclosures or who actively mislead clients about policy terms violate state insurance laws.
How RP Legal LLC Can Help
Our Track Record in IUL Litigation
RP Legal LLC has established itself as a recognized authority in IUL litigation nationwide. The firm has developed extensive experience representing victims of investment fraud. We focus on those harmed by deceptive indexed universal life policies.
Robert G. Rikard, the firm’s founding partner, has recovered over $100 million for clients through his 28 years of legal practice starting in 1997. His experience in IUL litigation has earned him national recognition and peer recognition for his legal knowledge, analytical capability, and judgment. You can view his Martindale-Hubbell profile for additional credentials.
The firm’s recent achievements include a significant victory against Pacific Life Insurance Company in May 2024. The firm has served on multidistrict litigation (MDL) steering committees and as lead counsel in numerous class actions. This demonstrates the legal community’s recognition of the firm’s capabilities. The firm’s national practice extends across the United States, with offices Nationwide.
Free Case Evaluation Process
RP Legal LLC offers free, confidential consultations to individuals who believe they may have been harmed by John Hancock IUL fraud. During this evaluation, the firm’s attorneys will:
Review Your Policy Documents: The firm’s attorneys will examine your original IUL policy, sales illustrations, and any subsequent communications from John Hancock. This helps identify potential legal violations and investment fraud red flags.
Analyze Sales Practices: The evaluation includes a detailed review of how your policy was sold. This includes the representations made by agents, the suitability of the product for your situation, and whether proper disclosures were provided. Our fraud lawyers have extensive experience identifying problematic sales practices.
Assess Damages: The firm will calculate your financial losses. This includes premium payments, lost cash value, and any additional costs incurred due to deceptive practices.
Explain Your Legal Options: Based on the evaluation, the attorneys will explain whether you have grounds for legal action. We will discuss the potential strategies for recovering your losses through FINRA arbitration or federal court litigation.
The consultation process is designed to be thorough yet accessible. We help clients understand complex legal and financial issues without obligation. The firm’s attorneys take time to explain how IUL policies work, why certain sales practices are problematic, and what remedies may be available.
No Fees Unless We Win Your Case
RP Legal LLC handles John Hancock IUL fraud cases on a contingency fee basis. This means clients pay no attorney fees unless the firm successfully recovers compensation on their behalf. This arrangement provides access to experienced legal representation regardless of your current financial situation.
The contingency fee structure aligns the firm’s interests with those of its clients. This provides strong incentives to achieve the best outcomes possible. Clients can pursue their claims without worrying about hourly billing or upfront costs. This allows them to focus on their case rather than legal expenses.
In addition to contingency fee arrangements, RP Legal LLC often handles cases through class action litigation. Individual clients may recover compensation without paying separate attorney fees. The firm’s experience with class actions and MDL proceedings enables efficient resolution of cases involving similar patterns of misconduct.
Financial and Insurance Firms We Target
Several large insurance firms have been implicated in class action IUL lawsuits. Below is a list of some of the brokerages and firms we might investigate:
Insurance Companies
- Allianz
- Columbus Life
- Family First Life
- Minnesota Life/Securian Financial
- National Life Group
- Pacific Life
- Protective
- Prudential
- Transamerica
Financial Firms
- Ameritas
- Equis Financial
- Equitable AXA
- Five Rings Financial
- Global Atlantic (Accordia)
- Integrity Marketing Group
- John Hancock
- LifePro Financial
- Mutual of Omaha
- North American
- Penn Mutual
- PHP Agency
- Symetra
- Symmetry Financial Group
- World Financial Group
Frequently Asked Questions About John Hancock IUL Lawsuits
What is the John Hancock IUL class action settlement about?
The John Hancock class action settlement involved over $123 million in compensation for policyholders whose Performance Universal Life policies were subject to unlawful cost of insurance increases beginning in 2018-2019. The settlement addressed claims that John Hancock violated policy terms by implementing substantial COI increases that caused financial harm to policyholders. Class members received automatic payments without needing to file individual claims. The settlement also included a 5-year freeze on further COI increases and restrictions on claim denials.
How do I know if my John Hancock IUL policy was sold fraudulently?
Signs of fraudulent sales include agents who described your IUL as an “investment” rather than insurance, promised returns, failed to explain cost increase provisions, or recommended the policy despite your age or financial situation making it unsuitable. If your policy has performed significantly worse than illustrated, required unexpected premium payments, or if you were not adequately informed about risks and costs, you may have grounds for legal action. Our guide on investment fraud red flags can help you identify additional warning signs.
How do I know if my John Hancock IUL policy was sold fraudulently?
Signs of fraudulent sales include agents who described your IUL as an “investment” rather than insurance, promised returns, failed to explain cost increase provisions, or recommended the policy despite your age or financial situation making it unsuitable. If your policy has performed significantly worse than illustrated, required unexpected premium payments, or if you were not adequately informed about risks and costs, you may have grounds for legal action. Our guide on investment fraud red flags can help you identify additional warning signs.
What damages can I recover in a John Hancock IUL lawsuit?
Potential damages include all premium payments made, lost cash value, additional costs incurred due to policy problems, and in some cases punitive damages. The specific damages depend on your individual circumstances. This includes how the policy was sold, what representations were made, and the extent of your financial losses. Some clients may also recover attorney fees and costs as part of their settlement or judgment. Our case results page shows examples of recoveries we’ve achieved for clients.
How long do I have to file a John Hancock IUL fraud claim?
Statutes of limitations vary by state and the legal theories involved in your case. Generally, fraud claims must be filed within 2-6 years of discovering the fraud. Contract claims may have longer limitation periods. However, some states have discovery rules that extend these deadlines. It’s important to consult with an attorney promptly to protect your rights.
What evidence do I need for my John Hancock IUL case?
Key evidence includes your original policy documents, sales illustrations, correspondence with John Hancock or agents, premium payment records, and any documentation of policy performance. Audio or video recordings of sales presentations, if available, can be particularly valuable. The firm’s attorneys can help you gather and organize the necessary documentation to support your claim.
Can I join an existing class action against John Hancock?
While the major John Hancock class actions have been resolved, new class actions may be filed as additional patterns of misconduct are discovered. Individual cases can sometimes be consolidated into class actions or multidistrict litigation if they involve similar legal issues. The firm’s attorneys can advise whether your case is suitable for class action treatment or should be pursued individually.
What are the signs of IUL fraud or misrepresentation?
Warning signs include agents who emphasized tax-free retirement income without explaining risks, used phrases like “be your own bank” or “no downside risk,” failed to explain cost increase provisions, recommended IUL policies to older clients, or presented unrealistic performance projections. If you were told the policy would “pay for itself” or that you could stop paying premiums after a few years, these may indicate fraudulent sales practices. Learn more about why IULs are a bad investment.
How much does it cost to hire an IUL fraud attorney?
RP Legal LLC handles John Hancock IUL fraud cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay no attorney fees unless the firm recovers compensation on your behalf. This arrangement allows victims of insurance fraud to access experienced legal representation without upfront costs or hourly billing concerns. The firm advances all case expenses and is only compensated when clients receive settlements or judgments.
Take Action: Contact Our John Hancock IUL Fraud Attorneys
If you purchased a John Hancock IUL policy and suspect you may have been the victim of fraud or misrepresentation, time is critical. Statutes of limitations can bar claims that are not filed promptly. Additionally, important evidence may be lost if you delay taking action.
RP Legal LLC offers free, confidential consultations to evaluate your potential claim. The firm’s attorneys have the experience and resources necessary to take on major insurance companies and fight for the compensation you deserve. With over $100 million recovered for clients and a track record of success in complex IUL litigation, RP Legal LLC stands ready to help you seek justice.
Contact RP Legal LLC today at (803) 805-7546 or complete our contact form to schedule your free consultation. Don’t let John Hancock’s deceptive practices go unchallenged. Take the first step toward recovering your losses and holding the company accountable for its actions.
The firm’s national practice means that regardless of where you live, experienced attorneys are available to help you work through the complex legal issues surrounding IUL fraud. With offices nationwide, and the ability to handle cases nationwide, RP Legal LLC has the geographic reach and legal knowledge to effectively represent your interests.
Remember, you have rights as an insurance consumer. Companies like John Hancock must be held accountable when they violate those rights. The attorneys at RP Legal LLC are committed to fighting for justice. We work to provide victims of insurance fraud with the compensation they deserve. Give us a call today: (803) 805-7546
Related Posts
- Pacific Life IUL Lawsuits: Legal Help for Victims
- Allianz IUL Lawsuit: Fighting Deceptive Insurance Practices
- Why IULs Are a Bad Investment: Understanding the Risks
- IUL vs Whole Life Insurance: Key Differences Explained
- Premium Financed IUL: Understanding the Risks
- Minnesota Life Securian Financial IUL Lawsuits
- National Life Group IUL Lawsuits
- Transamerica IUL Lawsuits